【警大考試-警大英文】104年警大研究所英文試題解析－警察英文

警察大學104年研究所入學考試

英文試題詳解

【警大考試-警大英文-呂艾肯】

所別：各所科目：共同英文

按下圖可顯示考試時間倒數

ㄧ、Vocabulary and Phrases：

題號	題目	擬答
（一）	輻射汙染	radiation contamination
（二）	自拍神器	selfie stick
（三）	事故現場	scene of accident
（四）	警政署署長	Director General of NPA
（五）	客機空難	the air crash of jetliner
（六）	司法互助	mutual/ reciprocal legal assistance
（七）	溫室效應	greenhouse effect
（八）	恐怖攻擊	terrorist attack
（九）	食安危機	the crisis of food safety
（十）	內線交易	insider trading

按下圖顯示警大研究所考試參考簡介

二、Translation：

（一）For at least half a century, police have considered it important to cut to a minimum of their response times to crime calls. The faster the response, they have reasoned, the better the chances of catching the criminal at or near the scene of the crime.（10分）

擬答:

至少已半世紀之久，警方對於報案來電處理反應的時間能縮減到最少認為是相當重要的。警方解釋，能越快反應，在犯罪現場或在附近追捕到嫌犯的機會就越大。

參考網址: http://www.cambridge.org/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780511189937&ss=exc

若有興趣可按此圖下載Spelman and Browny在1984出版的書籍全文pdf檔 (此為網路提供連結並非本人擁有)

（二）Officers shall not use their police power to resolve personal grievances (e.g. those involving the officer, family members, relatives, or friends) except under circumstances that would justify the use of self-defense, actions to prevent injury to another person, or when a serious offense has been committed that would justify an arrest.（10分）

擬答:

警務人員除了在合法進行自我防衛，為避免他人傷亡的行為，或有嚴重犯行進行時可合法拘捕下的情況外，不得行公權力之便解決私人恩怨（例如與員警牽扯者，家庭成員，親戚或者朋友）。

參考網址: http://www.ulm.edu/police/home

（三）The essence of the police role in maintaining order is to reinforce the informal control mechanisms of the community itself. Areas where community controls break down are vulnerable to criminal investigation.（10分）

擬答:

警方此角色在維持秩序上的本質，就是要強化社區本身那些非法定的控管機制。在社區控管失靈的地區進行犯罪調查是不容易的(軟弱無力的)。

參考網址: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/03/broken-windows/304465/

三、Reading Comprehension：（20分）

Another large-scale study conducted by William Spelman and Dale Brown and published in 1984 was also to challenge a core police assumption of that period – that improvement in rapid response to calls for service would lead to improvements in crime fighting. This study was developed in good part because of the findings of a prior investigation in Kansas City that found little support for the crime control effectiveness of rapid response to calls for service (Kansas City Police Department 1977). With support from the National Institute of Justice, Spelman and Brown investigated 4000 victims, witnesses, and bystanders in some 3300 serious crimes in four American cities. This was another major study in terms of the resources brought to bear and the methods used. Again it examined a strategy that was aided by technological advances in the twentieth century and that was central dogma of police administrators – that police must get to the scene of a crime quickly if they are to apprehend criminal offenders.

中譯:

另一項由William Spelman和Dale Brown進行，並在1984年出刊的大規模研究，也就是在挑戰那段時期警界核心的假設 – 那就是對報案能快速回應處理的改善將導致在打擊犯罪上有所改善。這項研究順利的發展是由於先前在堪薩斯城的調查發現 – 警方對於報案來電快速地回應對於控制犯罪的有效程度是毫無關聯（1977年堪薩斯城警察局）。有著國家司法機構的援助下，Spelman和Brown在美國四個城市中，對3300件重大犯罪中的4000名被害者，證人，和路人進行調查研究。以使用的資源及方法這些方面來看，這是另一個重大的研究。它再次地檢驗了20世紀因科技進步的協助下以及警方行政高層的中心思想的警政對策，此對策即假若警方要抓捕到罪犯，警方必須迅速抵達犯罪現場。